Publishing in journals indexed by Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) is a significant milestone for any PhD scholar. These databases represent the “gold standard” of academic credibility. However, their high standards often lead to rigorous peer review and high desk-rejection rates.

This guide outlines a strategic approach to writing and structuring your research paper to maximize its chances of acceptance.

---

1. The Pre-Writing Strategy: Journal Selection

Before you type a single word, you must identify your target. A “one-size-fits-all” manuscript rarely gets accepted in top-tier journals.

• Align with “Aims and Scope”: Most desk rejections happen because the topic doesn’t fit the journal’s focus. Read the last two issues of your target journal to understand the “flavor” of research they prefer.

• Check Indexing & Quartiles: Use the Scopus Source List or Web of Science Master Journal List to verify indexing. Aim for Q1 or Q2 (Quartile 1 or 2) journals if your findings are highly novel.

• The “Statement of Novelty”: High-impact journals seek original contributions. Ask yourself: Does my work fill a specific gap, or is it just a minor extension of existing work?

---

2. Standardizing the IMRAD Structure

Most Scopus/WoS journals follow the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).

A. Title and Abstract (The “Hook”)

• Title: Must be concise (10–15 words) and contain searchable keywords. Avoid “A Study of…” or “Investigation into…”

• Abstract: This is your sales pitch. It must include the problem, your unique method, key results, and the “so what?” (implications). Keep it between 150–250 words.

B. Introduction (The “Why”)

• Establish the research gap. Don’t just list what others have done; explain what is missing.

• Clearly state your Research Question or Hypothesis.

C. Methods (The “How”)

• This section must provide enough detail for another researcher to replicate your study.

• Mention specific software, sample sizes, and statistical tests ($p$-values, R2 scores, etc.).

D. Results and Discussion (The “What” and “So What”)

• Results: Use high-resolution figures (300 dpi) and clear tables. Do not repeat table data in the text word-for-word.

• Discussion: Compare your results with existing literature. Acknowledge limitations—this shows academic maturity and preempts reviewer critiques.

---

3. Mastering Academic Language and Ethics

Technical brilliance can be masked by poor presentation.

• Avoid “Engrish” or Machine Translation: Use professional editing services or tools like Grammarly and Paperpal.

• Plagiarism & Self-Plagiarism: Most journals use Turnitin or iThenticate. Ensure your similarity index is below 10–15%, and never “copy-paste” from your own previous conference papers without citation.

• Formatting: Follow the journal’s specific style (APA, Harvard, IEEE, etc.) to the letter. Use LaTeX for complex equations to ensure professional rendering.

  • Example: For a linear regression model, present it clearly:

    Y=β0​+β1​X1​+β2​X2​+ϵ

---

4. The Submission Package

The manuscript is only part of the process.