We adhere to a double-blind peer review process (in double-anonymized peer review, reviewers do not know the identity of authors, and vice versa). Each submitted paper is assessed by two subject matter experts who evaluate it based on our journal’s standards and the quality of the research. Should revisions be necessary, the same reviewers are assigned to ensure that the quality of the revised manuscript meets our expectations.

Reviewers are expected to maintain objectivity and uphold the integrity of the journal. Upon completing their review, reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest. They are also encouraged to identify any relevant works that have not yet been cited in the manuscript. Confidentiality of the review process is paramount.

Read: Peer Review Policy

Note: authors are encouraged to follow the guidelines set forth by the Aathiyoga Indian Journal of Ancient Medicine and Yoga or the MLA Handbook, 8th edition (for English), when preparing their research papers.